Log In | Register

Key Idea: A decrease in energy in one object or set of objects always is accompanied by an increase in energy in another object or set of objects.

Students should know that:

  1. The amount of energy in an object or set of interacting objects (system) can change.  When energy is transferred to a system, the amount of energy in that system increases (assuming no energy is transferred out of the system). When energy is transferred out of a system, the amount of energy in that system decreases (assuming no energy is transferred to the system).
  2. Whenever there is an increase in the amount of energy in one object or set of objects, there will be a decrease in the amount of energy in another object or set of objects.

 

Boundaries:

  1. Assessment items do not assess the idea that the increase in energy somewhere equals the decrease in energy somewhere else.  This idea is covered at the advanced level.  Assessment items may use the misconceptions that energy can be created or destroyed as distractors but the idea that because energy cannot be created destroyed any increase in energy must be equally balanced by a decrease in energy somewhere else will not be assessed.
  2. Students are not expected to know about energy-mass conversions such as nuclear reactions or other subatomic interactions.
Frequency of selecting a misconception

Misconception
ID Number

Student Misconception

Grades
4–5

Grades
6–8

Grades
9–12

NGM037

An object always gains energy as it moves. For example, the height that a pendulum reaches after it is released is greater than its starting height because it gains energy as it swings (Loverude, 2004).

23%

18%

15%

RGM075

The amount of elastic potential energy an object has is not related to how much it is stretched or compressed.

15%

14%

13%

NGM009

An object has energy within it that is used up as the object moves (Brook & Driver, 1984; Kesidou & Duit, 1993; Loverude, 2004; Stead, 1980).

15%

12%

12%

Frequency of selecting a misconception was calculated by dividing the total number of times a misconception was chosen by the number of times it could have been chosen, averaged over the number of students answering the questions within this particular idea.